Kundalini Gateway Email List Archives

line

To: K-list
Recieved: 1999/04/30 13:03
Subject: [K-list] Re:...(domchi) mucho rambling enclosed
From: Rik Wallace


On 1999/04/30 13:03, Rik Wallace posted thus to the K-list:

--- Domagoj Klepac <Domagoj.KlepacATnospampublic.srce.hr> wrote:

> Well, influence is one thing, reaction second, and shit the
> third. Shit makes possible for other's to influence you and
> trigger reactions which are actually not yours, but shit's.
>
> When there is no shit, you are the one who chooses how to
> react, depending on other's reactions. Others don't influence
> your reactions, you influence reactions.
>
> I don't see any paradox there. :)

  Maybe that is why I pointed one out. ;) ... because
  you seem to like analyzing differences, laying them out
  side-by-side as #1, #2, #3... and viewing that as Oneness.
  To some, who prefer to see things as *the same*, you
  present a paradox... different things that are somehow one.
 
D> > things over and over. What's next?".
>>
R> In my experience...the same 'thing' repeated over and
>> over. :) But I see how being open to new interpretations
>> could allow you to 'stay' and repeat the same thing over
>> and over without getting bored.

> Maybe, but then that thing is HUGE. It takes piles of time
> until another cycle. :) Interpretations and boredom are just
> a small part of that giant thing, which come at the beginning.

    Oh, I see you may have interpreted the 'thing' repeated
    over and over as 'life'... ok... so things are lives...
    and in my experience 'things' die and reincarnate over
    and over literally, by the 'moment'.....
    And for some reason, each new moment looks suspiciously like

    'someone' or something or some voice or words or scene or
    emotion or thought or action or 'someone' I've met before
    .... but they have a new haircut or are wearing glasses or
    *I'm* wearing glasses or 'something' different... or maybe
    they just remind me of someone I knew, maybe they remind me
    of my mother or my father, or some babysitter or cartoon
    character I saw long ago, but then thought I recognized
    just the other day, or even today, or even just a moment
    ago, and I feel like I *KNOW* this concept, even tho it
    seems a little different, and maybe, hmmm, it's MORE than
    a little different in important ways, like she would never
    wear her hair that way and her face is too different for
    makeup to have done that, so I guess she must not be who
    I think it is... unless she's playing a joke on me, b/c
    she does do that kind of thing, in fact *i know* that's
    exactly the kind of person she is, because my ex was
    the same way, always 'testing' me for some reason, and
    often I never knew what she was up to or what she wanted
    me to get out of this except maybe the hope that maybe
    i could predict what's going on b/c it repeats or something
    maybe... I'm not sure, b/c she IS a lot different from my
    ex and always said how she values honesty, but she does like
    to play jokes and that's kinda manipulative isn't it,
    to let someone believe one thing and then tell them that
    it's something else, but maybe she's into paradoxes and
    she sees both as 'the truth' so when she says it's really
    one thing, maybe she doesn't mean it's NOT the other thing,
    and I only react to it b/c I haven't seen how they're
    the same thing yet, so I keep moving around every time
    someone says something or something happens that reminds me
    of something different that I don't like, because I haven't
    figured out how they're joined as one, even tho I think
    they're opposites, like a paradox, and she was certainly
    a paradox in a lot of ways and I couldn't figure out how
    she could be so many 'opposite' things at once but maybe
    they're not really opposites from her perspective or maybe
    I only think they're opposites because I have a tough time
    keeping them both in mind at the same time, so I keep going
    through these loopy cycles from one extreme to the other,
    'but maybe this, but maybe that', which i can see makes a
    nice story with that ebb and flow kind of tension and i
    could kinda see how they're joined as one that way, like
    yin and yang, as two sides of me... but that's only in time,
    and i like to think as if there is just one moment (at least
    when the cycle returns :) and the 'memories' i see floating
    about aren't from any 'past' but are just images that are
    sitting on my desk now, and it's kinda funny how the photos
    seem to be placed in some place on the desk where i
    immediately know 'when' they happened, and sometimes I
    mess with 'em and stick 'em in different places to see if
    I notice a difference... which i guess is a joke i play
    on myself so why make a fuss about when someone else does
it,
    what's the difference, i don't know, i guess i seem to think

    that if someone on the 'approved list', like me or God, does

    it then it's ok (haha i'm being funny again, what a long
    cycle that was)... so anyway just figure that she is God
    and a part of the Greater Self and it's really no different
    from me playing a joke on myself and thus confusing myself
    into believing this but not that, and then that and not
this,
    and while i see no reason to get mad at myself, i'd kinda
    like to get even, and get back up to that 'karmic level'
    thingy and slap myself around a bit, but i guess i'd know
    i was coming :) and be prepared, but then again the last
time
    i was on that trip i remember that the whole 'joke' was
    just to 'mess around' with the pictures, so i probably
    wouldn't even 'remember' planning my revenge, b/c I
didn't...
    well until just now, doh!, so that's funny, i'm planning
    something without even realizing that if i'm planning
    i must be karmalizing, so here I am now in 'karmic mode',
    slapping my face for being so stupid --- hey, it works!
    The cycles and meta-cycles have merged. Finally.
 

> No, no... step /step/ n 1 the act of putting one foot in front
> of the other in order to move along... ;)

  (referring to a discussion from several months ago...)

     What about the angels who don't have feet?
 
     (seriously)
    -rik

_________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free ATnospamyahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

blank
DISCLAIMER!

Home | Archive Index | Search the archives | Subscribe
blank
K.  List FAQ | Kundalini FAQs | Signs and  Symptoms | Awakening Experiences | K. list Polls | Member Essays | Meditations | List Topics | Art Gallery | Cybrary | Sitemap | Email the moderators.
line
  • Feel free to submit any questions you might have about what you read here to the Kundalini mailing list moderators, and/or the author (if given). Specify if you would like your message forwarded to the list. Please subscribe to the K-list so you can read the responses.
  • All email addresses on this site have been spam proofed by the addition of ATnospam in place of the at symbol symbol.
  • All posts publicly archived with the permission of the people involved. Reproduction for anything other than personal use is prohibited by international copyright law. ©
  • This precious archive of experiential wisdom is made available thanks to sponsorship from Fire-Serpent.org.
  • URL: http://www.kundalini-gateway.org/klist/k1999/k9901158.html