kundalini-l-d Digest Volume 96 : Issue 195 1 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: davelong Subject: WHY?? Rondi McBoyer wrote: > Dear davelong, > I have been reading your diatribes and lectures for many weeks without > saying anything, but now I really must ask you... WHY? what is it that > makes you continue to post to a group of people who obviously are not > interested in your point of view? I wait for your answer, Rondi Hello, Rondi, and to the others who expressed similar sentiments. Although a large part of Kundalini involves a great loss of being understandable to others, I usually try to make sure that what I write is as clear and concise as possible, and is not misconstrued. Alas, many of the things I have written on the list violates the tenets I was taught. The first tenet is secrecy. One must not divulge to others the core experience of Kundalini: the vision of God. There are many good reasons for doing so. Others should come to recognize the Light, rather than being told about it. Then, there are issues of personal safety, and being free to develop as God and grace see fit. Another tenet I had violated was that no knowledge is to be given unless it is asked for. The recipient has to be ready to receive it. These tenets were taught to me by my teacher. Lucky, indeed, are they who are blessed with a competent Kundalini teacher! We shared many inspiring talks on the nature of God, and the path to Him. After a time, his words would start to focus more and more on the subject of morality. At first, I would listen lightly, and nod, and not really understand the import of his words. But after a while, I began to really listen to what he had to say, and it just opened my eyes. I was hearing true wisdom, coming from a really loving heart. - Many of the ideas you had read expressed in my posts were really paraphrases of his own words. That they came across as mean, or hateful, or spiteful, only attests to my own lack of being an adequate relayer of the wonderful, loving lessons I had learned from him. The important message I wanted to offer is that morality is the prime prerequisite for advancement along the path. That's just Reality. Allow me to say that should you or anyone have any questions about the process, the answers will come if it be the will of God. A teacher always accompanies an active Kundalini, should God so will the soul to advance. Hence, there should be no anxiety about this. Kundalini is taught and transmitted from person-to-person, not digitized-bytes-to-person. Find a traditional religion; one which reveres a dead person is usually the safest. There is the Vedanta Society, founded by a disciple of Sri Ramakrishna. There are especially great teachers to be found in the three desert religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. They are the safest, easiest paths, with centuries of cumulative wisdom. - I apologize for any pain and confusion my words may have brought to others. Regards, David 2 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: Royale Jills Subject: List I truly wish that we could all talk about how to improve on our K.awakening. The book previously mentioned, "a gentle guide to K. Awakening" is a good book for discussion. It gives step by step guidance for re awakening K. Why dont we all read it, try it, and discuss it? Then the topic would be right on. Just a suggestion. Royale - 3 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: Royale Jills Subject: Re: Books. Books? Yes Mary, a book recently discussed is "Kundalini Awakening, A Gentle Guide to Chakra Activation and Spritual Growth" by john selby. I believe several members are now using this book, including myself, to reawaken K. It seems pretty goodand was recommended by Haakon. I think we could discuss it on this list is we want to. Royale 4 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: Jan Watson Subject: Re: The Unimportance of Kundalini Peter Norton wrote: > > I was surprised to see no explicit replies to this > essay of davelong's. > The argument reminds me of the old battle > against the Gnostics such as Valentinus by Bishop > Irenaeus in the 2nd century C.E. Gnostics were a group > of people claiming extraordinary inner experiences and > disparaging the 'ordinary' Christians, even Bishops, > who hadn't gone through the transformation, and didn't > have the 'inner eye of knowledge', and so 'didnt know > what they were talking about'. Hi Irony Dave's last posting was the story of one of the greatest Gnostics of all time who was not a Christian at all. Mmmmmmm. jan > 5 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: lodpressATNOSPAMinetworld.com (Larry Newman) Subject: Re: Follow up & question about death Royale Jills wrote: > > Yes, Holly. > I noticed when my mom died altough I wasnt there, I talked to the nurse > at the home where she was and also my daughter who was there and they > said that she had exteremely loud breathing for about a day before she > died even though she was in a coma. The nurse said they many old people > do this kind of breathing before they die and i thought of the life > force also. Royale Royale, - I was with a dear friend that died from breast cancer at the time of her death. Judy was a very unusual person in that she never had treatment for her cancer, and ... for those with weak stomachs maybe you'll want to stop here. Anyway, the cancer literally ate her breasts off it took 12 years to do it however. Judy was deathly afraid of surgery and drugs, she never took anything for pain until up to the last maybe six months when our friend, who is her doctor, talked her into using percadan. Judy was still worried about being a drug addict because she thought she could beat it. Anyway, Judy was and is a beautiful soul, her mother cared for her through out this experience and never bad vibed her for not doing the traditional thing. She did get several blood transfusions in the last year, and in spite of how really awful and ugly it looked, her mom changed her bandages three or four times a day. She wasn't in terrible pain at all until the end.She never lost her sense of humor and participated in life right until the end. Being with Judy at the time of her death was a gift to me, it was like she was waiting for me to get their that day. I had been doing something and all of a sudden she flashed to me, I dropped everything and ran right over to her house, she was home on hospice. We had spoken of this transition many times, I told her I would be there for her, and that when the time was right we would both know it and all that was left to do was let go. God, the angels and saints would be with her, as she knew from the start. I was a part of the transition team and was blessed to be her coach. She told me that she knew she was an angel and that she would continue to be near me as an angel. She always believed that God was taking care of her and never lost that faith and knowing. At the time of Judy's death she knew I was there, in fact, my partner, Pam and her month old baby was with me. It was like we had life, and death, she looked at us, tears of joy flowed down her face. Because Judy didn't fight it, she accepted it and it was very beautiful. Bonnie, Judy's mom told me she thought it was so appropriate to have baby Katie there. It was like the beginning and the end were represented to make it very real and beautiful. And the illusion of death was ugly at all. Just something that is. Gloria - 6 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: susanmayATNOSPAMdigital.net Subject: Re: asanas for celibacy (long) Lia, Thanks for sharing these asanas. There are always nice surprises on this list. ATNOSPAMSue >>I think it was Dan who asked me a LONG time ago to post some yoga poses i had found that are supposed to help rechannel sexual energy when one is unable to have an outlet for it. I finally found the book (in a mess of renovations) so here they are" >>taken from :Ashtange Yoga Primer by Baba Hari Dass >>NOBILITY POSE (Bhadrasans) LEG TWIST POSE (Kandapidasana) COW'S HEAD POSE (Gomukhasana) ADEPT'S POSE (Siddhasana) TOE BALANCE POSE (Padangushthasana) >>hope this all helps. the book itself has great photos (i hope i don't get into any sort of coyright trouble by copying out the descriptions though). enjoy and blessed be >>Lia 7 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: davelong Subject: Kundalini Krucified [An astounding medeival view of one saint's death by decapitation. Saint Catherine of Siena was married to Jesus. He gave her a ring which only she could see, but not if ever her mind strayed from her Spouse.] Another conversion, perhaps the most dramatic of all and most characterist- ic of Catherine's work, was that of the young Nicolo Toldo, condemned to death for having spoken ill of the Republic. He was a nobleman of Perugia, whose character and family background had given promise of a splendid future. He was in the dirty jail, awaiting decapitation like a common assassin when the priest, Tommaso Caffarini, came to speak to him of resignation. He turned upon Caffarini furiously, blaspheming against a God who permitted such savagery. The case was desperate. Catherine was asked to visit the young man in his cell. No one else could relate what followed so well as the saint herself, as she did in a letter dictated to Fra Raimondo: "I had already received a suggestion as how to proceed - a suggestion of such charm that the heart cannot think of it nor tongue speak, nor eye see, nor ear hear. The will of God, among His other mysteries, preceded me; it would take too much time to explain. I went to visit him whom you know: he received such comfort and consolation that he was completely resigned, and went to confession. And he made me promise, by God's love, that when his time would come I should be with him. I promised and I was there. I went to him early that fateful morning and he received great consolation. He assist- ed at Mass and received Holy Communion - his first. His will was attuned to the will of God and subject to it; there remained only a certain apprehen- sion lest he would not be strong enough at the very end. However, the im- measurable and burning goodness of God was his strength, inspiring him with such affection and love in the desire for God that he kept repeating: 'Abide with me and do not abandon me!' And I held his head on my breast and I sensed his happiness, a new odor in his blood; and it was like the odor of mine as I long to shed it for Jesus, my Spouse. And as this desire grew in my soul I sensed a touch of fear in him and I said: 'Take comfort, my sweet brother; for soon we shall be admitted to the espousals. You will be bathed in the sweet blood of the Son of God, our adored Jesus, Whom I want you to keep ever before your mind. And I shall await you at the place of justice. Take heed, then, my son, that you banish every fear from your heart; let your countenance change sadness into joy!' And he was happy and exclaimed in exultation: 'Whence should such grace be mine, that my sweet friend will be waiting for me in the holy place of justice?' You see that he had been filled with such light that he called holy the place of justice! Then he said, 'I shall go forth all strong and glorious; it will seem a thousand years before I reach there, thinking all the while that you will be waiting dor me.' And he spoke words so sweet that they must have come straight from the goodness of God. "So I waited for him at the place of execution; and as I waited I prayed earnestly in the presence of Mary and Catherine, virgin and martyr. But before reaching him I knelt down and placed my own neck on the execution- er's block; but I was filled with revulsion - I was too filled with self- love. I rose and I prayed again and exclaimed: 'Mary! I wish this favor, that right up to the time of his execution he will have interior light and peace of heart so that I may see him strong to the last.' Then my soul was filled with consolation so that, although there was a crowd around I could not see anyone for happiness at the promise he had made me. "Then he came, meek as a lamb, and seeing me he began to smile; and he turned to indicate that I was to make the sign of the cross over him. When I had done so I said, 'Kneel down! to the nuptials, my sweet brother! Soon you will be enjoying eternal life.' He knelt down with great meekness; and bending over him I laid bare his neck and reminded him of the blood of the Lamb. His lips kept murmuring 'Jesus!'...then, 'Catherine!' As he spoke my name I took his head between my hands, reminding him of the goodness of God and I said to him: 'I wish it!' - Then the God-Man appeared, as if in the brightness of the noon-day sun; He appeared distinctly and received Nicolo's blood; in that blood there was the fire of holy longing, given to him and hidden in his soul through grace; Our Lord received it into the fire of His own divine love. Because He had received the blood and fulfilled the youth's desire, He received his soul and mercifully placed it in the wound in His side. Truth Itself manifested that He received that soul by His grace and His mercy and not through any human merit. O how sweet and ineffable to see the goodness of God! With what tenderness and love He watched that soul as it left the body!" .... "Nicolo has behaved with such charm as to attract a thousand hearts. And I was not surprised, because he was already tasting the sweetness of God. He turned slightly, as a bride would when she is about to meet her bridegroom, turning her eyes and her head and bowing her thanks to those who have accompanied her. "Seeing that gesture, my soul, reposed in peace and quiet, though I was faint at the sight of the blood that covered him. Oh, how miserable I am! I cannot say more. I remained on the ground, envying him. Do not wonder, then, that I urge nothing more upon you than that you be nourished in the blood and the fire that come from the side of the Son of God. Delay no longer, my dearest children, for the blood is flowing and will give you life. My sweet Jesus; Jesus, my love." --Saint Catherine of Siena, [A.D. 1347-1380] -by Igino Giordani - 8 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: liaATNOSPAMquadrant.net (lia pas) Subject: Re: Good book. > This weekend I read a really good book called "Bringers of the Dawn: >Teachings from the Pleiadians" channelled by Barbara Marciniak. i read this book a few years ago and it competley changed my outlook on life, and made alot of sense out of what had been going on with my mind and body all my life. i've read it a couple of more times since, and find every time it brings me back to centre. (perhaps now's a good time to pick it up again ;) > I found it in a new age used bookstore, It grabbed me by the antennae, and >I could not put it down, except a few times when some big integrations >happened, and I had to stop and shut down my logical conscousness for a few >moments. i had the same experience reading it. it all flows, and all makes so much sense. - Much of the information won't make sense until we evolve enough to process >it, much like a zen koan doesn't make any sense until you've been there. >Best thing to do, submit to the process, soak up as much light as you can, >and focus on the fact that your beliefs and desires shape your world, often >in a very limiting fashion. Light is information. Emotion is power. You can >follow the paths of emotion into past lives or other dimensions of being. >Allow yourself to be confused without being frightened. Trust in the light, >to guide you gracefully to that moment of gestalt, when your mind makes an >evolutionary leap, and things make sense again. - this is very true. there are things i read in the book a few years ago, that didnt' make sense to me then, but do now. liek how my body is changin, like how my head feels when certain things happens to me. it is all transformation thanks for starting this thread Angelique. :) Lia - 9 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 From: susanmayATNOSPAMdigital.net Subject: Re: No compromise with Kundalini, please! Royale said: >>Hi P. As an astrologer I can agree with you about learning a little and then expounding greatly, however, I do not think astrology is a spiritual study. The Hari Krishnas have identified it as the highest of the material studies, and I can agree with that.Love Royale Royale, Prafulla is another student of Vedic Astrology like myself. Vedic Astrology, as the name implies, comes down to us from the Vedas and is considered sacred. The study of Jyotish The Science of Light (Vedic Astrology) is a wonderful way to become enlightened. Even in the West, there are a lot of esoteric astrologers who look at the deeper meanings of the astrological symbology rather than just using it to predict health, career, romance etc. I rather doubt that the Hare Krishnas, as a group, would consider this their formal position on the subject, perhaps it was in fact only one individual? Anyway, you have a right to your own opinion. I think we're getting a little off subject here maybe we can communicate more along these lines in private. Namaste, ATNOSPAMSue - 10 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 From: "Your friend at:" Subject: Re: Kundalini Krucified To whom it may concern, I would just like to mention that St. Catherine of Sienna often referred to God as the Godhead. Sincerely, Christopher ********************** "The person who is not disturbed by happiness and distress and is steady in both is certainly eligible for liberation." Bhagavad gita as it is 2.15 - ********************** On Mon, 14 Oct 1996, davelong wrote: > [An astounding medeival view of one saint's death by decapitation. Saint > Catherine of Siena was married to Jesus. He gave her a ring which only > she > could see, but not if ever her mind strayed from her Spouse.] > I cannot say more. I remained on the ground, envying him. Do not wonder, > then, that I urge nothing more upon you than that you be nourished in > the > blood and the fire that come from the side of the Son of God. Delay no > longer, my dearest children, for the blood is flowing and will give you > life. My sweet Jesus; Jesus, my love." > > --Saint Catherine of Siena, [A.D. 1347-1380] -by Igino Giordani > > - 11 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 From: davelong Subject: Re: The Unimportance of Kundalini Peter Norton wrote: > The argument reminds me of the old battle > against the Gnostics such as Valentinus by Bishop > Irenaeus in the 2nd century C.E. Gnostics were a group > of people claiming extraordinary inner experiences and > disparaging the 'ordinary' Christians, even Bishops, > who hadn't gone through the transformation, and didn't > have the 'inner eye of knowledge', and so 'didnt know > what they were talking about'. > > This sort of conflict has always been around. And it will no > doubt become more pronounced as the New Age and the New Physics > and the New Neurology and the Archaic Revival etc etc gather > momentum. So Kundalinists should think deeply about > arguments such as davelong's, and try to understand the > resentment that their experience can generate from the > point of view of those who feel 'left out'. > All the best wishes of 'love and light' are not going > to stave off this conflict. The perennial subject of science > fiction is manifesting before our very eyes: that of a new > species of being growing out of the old, and the problem of > their coexisting without the old destroying the new from > misunderstanding and resentment. Hello, Peter. You present an interesting hypothesis, but I would suggest another way of looking at this "New Species," which can plentifully be found in the pews of the Churches, Synagogues, and Mosques. They are being persecuted by the derision, hatred and jealousy of those who hold the reins of Cultural Power in this world: the neo-moralists. They are the ones waging war against the New Species, trying to enforce their valuelessness and way of life, um, death, upon the masses. They are the entertainment industry, the mainline "news" mouthpieces of the fashionable fad causes, the university Marxist professors of the Soft Sciences, (where sociology and psychology today are no more advanced than mere alchemy was to today's chemistry) and other groups of educators, politicians, artists and writers and musicians. And it isn't just in this country anymore. The Europeans in history went through the world, plundering its resources. The new wave of colonialists from the Hollywood glitterati, the neo-moral colonialists, are busy destroying traditional cultures throughout the world, and the devastation is worldwide. In a time when religion becomes mocked, and notions such as morality and guilt are considered passe in the pop culture, what role should Kundalini energy play in turning around the cultural destruction? When TIME declares that God is dead, does an enlightened being step forward to correct the error? ##> ** The Unimportance of Kundalini ** > > Agreed, Kundalini as such is unimportant. It is not > an end in itself. It is something that has to be gone > through, just like adolescence, on the way to spiritual > maturity. That's right. The path is not the goal, but the path does have a goal. ##> When you contemplate the people, you realize that ##> most of humanity will have no use for any discussions ##> on such an esoteric topic as kundalini. > True of religion in general. True of any specialty. But religion has a most important role. Religion is nothing more that the institutionalization of divine wisdom, imparted by God to men and women who were close to Him. Religion is so important that the lowest level of hell is reserved for those who thwart it, the people's only way to salvation. Look at something so basic as the 10 Commandments, which most of us were taught. They can be distilled into this statement: "Don't be cruel to oneself. Don't be cruel to others. Don't be cruel to God. In other words: Be kind." Now, if you teach this wisdom to the people, it brings about a much better result than were you to start teaching them how to see God. And besides, the 10 Commandments are going to be a requisite, anyway, to the vision of God in the 6th chakra. - Just look at our current materialist pop culture, which says you are nothing if you are not successful, not wealthy, not young, not strong, not fashionable, not healthy, and not without all the 'right' proportions. What should Kundalini say to this cultural plight of wrong values? You are nothing if your Kundalini isn't activated? If you haven't been to the xth chakra? Rather, Kundalini should advance and champion the traditional religious values in society. ##> Even for those who find themselves in the throes of ##> an active kundalini, I wonder about the direction ##> and efficacy such discussions should take. I mean, what ##> does one talk about? Should focus be given to the ##> strange and wonderful experiences? Why should they be ##> aired at all, since they are only traps along the way? > except that since it is so unknown in this culture, it is > easy to feel like you're all alone and going crazy. Many, > many people have been institutionalized unnecessarily. > Isnt this reason enough to talk about it? Ah, I can see a new 'minority group' in the wings, complete with its own prescribed protections: the kundalini-impaired! But seriously, one should change gears, and take a detached view here: As a believer in reincarnation, I see this question more broadly. If I had to undergo, say, alcoholism, in order to get beyond it, would God have placed me in a hashish culture? No, just as one who needs to go beyond hashish is not born into an alcohol culture. For sure, one should not condone the institutionalization of people because of Kundalini, but I firmly believe that teachers always come with the activation, should it be in God's will for that soul to advance. Another question you might ask is if more HARM would come from the dissemination of Kundalini than in any rescue of the institutionalized. I would hazard a guess that the institutions would become fuller of valid patients. ##> One who wishes to make progress on the path soon ##> discovers the nature of the attacks, the suggestions, ##> the fears, the confusions, and the pitances. Kundalini ##> is first and foremost a BATTLEFIELD for the soul, and ##> the warfare can be great. In fact, kundalini mirrors ##> the general spiritual battlefield going on everywhere, ##> a battle for human hearts and souls. A human soul lost ##> to the devil becomes his loot, his booty. Demons have a ##> supreme hatred of the human soul, since it was created > demons, battlefields, warfare ... sigh, the old Western > archetypes are so tempting. Believe in them and they > manifest, no doubt about it. They are there. But they > are yet another illusion, just like all the flashing lights > of Kundalini. If you see a demon, catch it as fast as you > can and give it a big wet sloppy kiss right on the lips! > That is the only way to make them go away, it seems. > Read about St Anthony in the desert of Egypt. The Lord's Prayer is most effective in scaring away demons. Illusions? Perhaps in the sense that through the grace of God, they can buzz around one's soul like bees, but can never sting, unless one pays attention to them. When Sri Krishna destroyed demons, He conferred liberation to them by His killing them. God can no wrong or evil. It is a kindness to destroy demons. However, I would not look at history, even recent history, even in this very century, and view the millions upon untold millions who were murdered by governments, that demons have no powers. ##> Show me a person who goes to Mass on Sundays, or to ##> the Mosque on Fridays, or to the Synagogue on Saturdays, ##> who lives a decent, kind life, who does the will of God, ##> and who never heard of the word 'kundalini', and I will ##> show you one of 4 billion people who are storing up the ##> one thing needed in life: grace, which will lead to an ##> eternity of bliss. > This is an interesting point. It raises all the issues > of faith vs works, and 'the letter killeth but the spirit > gives life', and the phenomenon of people who can recite > the Bible backwards and forwards but have no Love, nor knowledge. > > The eternity of bliss is merely a hypothesis. The saints I have > read tell me that you must find it Here, to find it There. If > we putter around in church and in Scripture once a week for an > hour or so, never once allowing enough time for the Holy Spirit > to manifest, an eternity of bliss would be a most incredible result. > > It also begs the question, HOW does one DO the Will of God? > How, without the guidance of the Holy Spirit? How can we know > the Will of God without the Holy Spirit? It seems to ignore > the possibility that Kundalini could be another word for Holy > Spirit. Is this all that controversial? > > As Carl Jung said, "Religion is a defense against the > religious experience." The whole structure of everyday > churchgoing is designed, it seems, to cater to those fearful > of any real experience beyond the 'normal' and 'safe'. > Though someone has to do all the potlucks and bake sales, > I suppose. - All good questions, Peter. For most people, just hearing Scriptures once a week, and even participating in the occassional bake sale might just BE all that God requires of them. Others raise families, and teach them traditional values, and provide a religious education. What a boon to be born into such a family! Even just giving birth brings with it immense rewards in the Afterlife, considering all the pain a mother goes through. Add to that the immense glory from having raised a family, and imparting traditional, religious values, and you have grace upon grace. To downcast such a "humdrum non-kundalini" or "non-Holy-Spirit" lives is to set one apart as elitest. And, yes, I would agree that the Holy Spirit is Kundalini at the 5th chakra. The good feeling of grace one feels while walking out of Church in no way makes it less important to the soul, just because it isn't yet a whirlwind of ecstasy. Regards,